Adam and Joe Illustration Crit.

Drawing only half a Bowie face behind a not-Joe looking Joe is a cop-out. I know its a cop out because Ive used this trick often.

So this James Hood fellow is the new ‘resident’ illustrator for Adam and Joe at the Big British Castle…

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Ok so I’m jealous. I’ll admit it.

Madly jealous.

I feel terribly petty about it, but Adam has plugged this guy in every show since they came back from their long sabbatical and it fills me with both with an inner rage and envious bile.

Damn him. And his ‘resident’ status.

I want it to be me!!

I feel this way about anyone Adam and Joe mention – During Text the Nation particularly. There’s an immediate and INTENSE resentment towards the person whose emails have been read out. I want the world to IMPLODE violently so I’m the ONLY surviving Adam and Joe listener so they HAVE to read out my email, even if it’s just a list of my groceries for the week.

My rage against Mr. Hood is however largely because I genuinely don’t like the way he draws. At all, on any level – which I will go into in detail below.

So lets put my pettiness and territorial jealousy to one side and critique this mans work as objectively as I can (snort)

Please feel free to disagree as volubly as you like about my critique and please post any rebuttals in the comment section below. I always feel a good crit is meant to inflame and aggravate.

Lets dive right in there:

To begin – I dislike scribble drawings.

I mean, really, this faux-naive cartoon style is in itself so immensely irritating.

I’m not talking about Outsider art or even the naive style of painting (both of which I enjoy), because they have some other redeeming qualities beyond perfect and immaculate drawing. Colour, texture, humour, content, intensity of detail.

I’m talking about badly drawn cartoons that seem (to me) to be stylistically manufactured to wallpaper over poor drawing skills and laziness of observation. (I’m channeling Foz and Gary here, can you feel it?)

I’m happy to forgive it as a ‘style’ if the drawing is secondary to the content.

Perhaps the content is dark or biting or funny or witty (á la Shrigley) but if nothing new is brought to the table either stylistically or in terms of content I don’t know what there is to look at.

Therefore I find James Hood’s work rather mediocre. He brags about having won ‘Young cartoonist of the year’ – twice no less. For what I’m not really sure. (meow pussy cat)

1. His work is not funny ha ha.

2. It’s not even funny I’m-laughing-on-the-inside.

This drawing bores me and simultaneously irritates me with the terrible drawing of Joe and Adam and Photoshop colouring in.

Adam said he ‘liked the naive style and almost grotesque drawings’ but it isn’t enough one way or another. There’s not really enough of anything. Not weird enough, not detailed enough, not funny enough.

And it’s all so Tesco’s basic. He could fill this page end to end with characters instead of largely using the Photoshop paint-bucket fill tool to colour it black

Someone on the comment feed compared him to the illustrator Andrew Rae (hardly to Rae’s credit). Rae’s work is in fact very carefully drawn and is crawling with small but interesting details.

Andrew Rae: Last Night A spread from my Comic Grey Matter as featured in Posterpaper by JaguarShoes Collective

Hood again: This one is marginally better than the space one.

Hood’s work on the other hand feels heavily stylized. Heavy being the right word. It’s all flat and lacking any subtle touches. The ‘shaky hand’, the little half-finished lines, the lumpiness, the one-tone colours in pastels.

Yawn yawn. Generic cartoon network/Nickleodeon minus the fun animation and silly voices.

Am I being hugely bitchy? Probably, but nonetheless I think my criticisms are valid ones.

Below is a Nickleodeon cartoon called ‘Arrgh! Real Monsters’ which reminds me of this style. Lots of half lines and scratches and lumpiness. There are a variety of cartoons like this. But I particularly like the monsters in this one. They have fun little quirks and live in the sewer eating unpleasant things.

Hood’s likenesses are also poor – this is coming from someone who really struggles to produce decent likenesses. Perhaps that’s what irks – I struggle – this guy just poops out some shoddy scribble and is PLUGGED, oh my lord how he is plugged, on the show. (So much resentment)

Unless labeled as such I wouldn’t be able to tell that this was about Adam and Joe at all. I mean come on man, take the time to draw Joe a chin. Don’t be so bloody lazy.

To his credit however, I think his output is prompt and very quick, as it has to be to make one for every show for the next 12 weeks.

So to conclude – I’m just not feeling this guy. On any level. Drawing, humour or observation.

And I suppose am vaguely disappointed in Adam’s taste in illustration (although I suppose it does sort of fit the studenty-scribbly aesthetic I’ve always imagined A&J probably have.)

You may of course, dismiss this critique as biased and vitriolic, and some of it, perhaps is (Young Cartoonist of the Year. Snort.) but largely I stand by my critique of Jame’s work.

You know, it’s OK. It’s not bad, but it’s not good.

It’s just so….Meh.

Scribbles. I mean, what can I say.

About these ads

16 thoughts on “Adam and Joe Illustration Crit.

  1. I’m a bit sad that he’s drawn BaaadDad in there. As for the illustration? S’alright in places. Being mentioned by Adam & Joe can be very exciting though, so I can understand his vigourous attempts to maintain a bit of Adam&Jo-file (profile – arf!) Your Idiothole’s Guide, without hyperbole, is a million billion times better though. Maybe you should spam that out and do a bit of thunder stealin! POW!

  2. I was thinking baad dad was the best bit really. Why does he make you sad?

    I know it IS very exciting. This is why I have so much resentment.

    Especially since they mention him on every episode so far :(

    But no thunder stealing. I already feel guilty about writing this but they will never see it and good to get it out of my system.

    boo hiss

  3. I think it’s because it’s the ‘Pervy’ version of Baaad. I prefer to think of him sipping sherry while listening to The Prodigy.

    I was tempted once to try writing to BaaadDad asking for one piece of life advice. I was hoping he would write back with some salient slice of wisdom. I never did. Hmmm… I might still do it.

  4. Probably best you miss this week’s show… not only an extended mention but a “Travellin’ Tales” tale which really belongs to Richard Herring. Hmmm… he kinda grasses him up! Poor podchat.

    You must have a Travellin Tale to spin eh? At least one.

  5. I just read through the Idiothole’s Guide again and noticed you used Bottomless Pitt and Pitt’s Knitts! Those were my texty nations. Sweeeet.

    I’ve had two other texter nayshuns but I like the Pitt ones the best. Hurrah!

  6. Do it.

    Oz SQUADRON! Made up jokes (via tumblr). Couple of new Song Wars. Travellin’ Tales. Popropriation. Cornish the torpedo commander. The podcast name timeline -chatmax! Is that it? It might take a while. hmmm…

  7. popopriating might take too long. its very sporadic so i might just squeeze it in a “new features” section thus squishing the whole thing into one.
    lets see. I’ll have to re-listen to old podcasts.
    Boggins gets a section. Made up jokes gets a link – because i think that feature is over.
    Auntie nubbins has brilliantly covered the podcast intros
    whats cornish torpedo commander?
    time line is good idea.

  8. Torpedo Commander Cornish is when he interrupts or generally derails a Buxton conversation. Usually because he’s a bit bored or disagrees…

    You’re right though, there’s millions of stuff. They need to release another Adam & Joe book.

    New sketches are great btw.

  9. gracias.
    they SHOULD do another book. i don’t have any of their earlier stuff.
    i feel bad the show is going to be so intermittent from now on. 12 weeks isnt very long after a 1.5 yr break.

Deranged comments preferred

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s